273 points were taken into consideration. It is hard to avoid the conclusion that in overruling the Magistrate on a question of fact, you have either given too much weight to very weak evidence or relied too much upon your own views in opposition to the judicial decision.
I feel myself obliged to withhold my approval. Were I to approve the action you have taken, it would imply that I am satisfied that Hal was more than 18 years of age when he declared himself to be 15. The decision of the Magistrate, in opposition to the views of the Executive Council, appeared to be that he should be considered under 16.
273
ponits
into consideration
@armot
---
aroid
Ke
conclusion that in overruling
the Magistales
on.
G
question of face you
have
either given
on bue
Weight
to very
weak
widenc
hape
relied
AL
open won
upon your
in opposition to the judicial
These
myself obliged to withnow.
apporal.
Were
my
grounds;
I to approve
which
You
the action
have taken
it would imply
an
satisfied
By Lo
that
Hal
More
than 18 years of age,
when he declared himself
to be 15
decis con
of
the Fazishalis,
appositio
-to
the
and
h.
with out ascertaining
te veins of
Council;
ana
the Executive
feel
Myself
and
when
Magistrats judicially
decided
appeared
that
to be
should
he
under 16;
thereby
Courty
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.